KATE MOSS AND MY FREDDIE? HE COULDN'T STAND HER .. SHE WAS FAR TOO FLAT-CHESTED
From The Mirror on Sunday
PRINCESS Michael of Kent has launched an astonishing attack on supermodel Kate Moss, criticising her for being flat-chested.
The Princess said that Kate, who was once linked with her son Lord Frederick Windsor, never stood a chance with him.
"She wasn't his type at all," she said. "He couldn't stand her - she was so flat-chested."
The pair were said to be an item after meeting at a photo shoot for the society magazine Tatler two years ago.
Freddie was pictured in eye shadow and a spiked dog collar draped all over Kate in a series of mock wedding shots for fashion label Burberry.
But Princess Michael, better known as Princess Pushy, says that claims of a romance were greatly exaggerated.
Her outburst came at the after-show party of a preview screening of Lighthouse Hill, a low-budget British romantic comedy starring Jason Flemyng.
The Princess, who spends much of her time lecturing about history in the United States, then confessed how she covets a career in television. "I really want to be the next David Attenborough of history television," she said. "I really think I can do it."
And not content with insulting Kate - who is soon to have journalist Jefferson Hack's baby - she then launched a tirade against TV historians. "Most of the people we have presenting programmes like this know their stuff but they are so ugly - they wear all these horrible clothes and look so unglamorous."
Related links:
---> "One hot summer’s day a fox was strolling through an orchard till he came to a bunch of grapes..."
---> Check Kate's flat chest at Facescafe

From the Sidney Morning Herald, special thx to Phill for the tip:

Having struggled to make a buck in the cut-throat Australian market, Conde Nast finally called it a day on Monday. From next month its prestigious local titles, which include Vogue, GQ and Conde Nast Traveller, will be published by IPMG's burgeoning lifestyle division, fpcLiving.
The licensing agreement caught the industry unawares. Although it is widely estimated Conde Nast has been losing at least $5 million a year down under, the normally reliable publishing grapevine had heard barely a whisper that its Australian titles were up for grabs.
At first blush the haute couture international milieu of Vogue is a world away from the humble Randwick butcher shop from which the Hannan empire emerged late last century. The Hannans moved into publishing with the Randwick Coogee Weekly in 1932, expanding into printing in the 1970s.
Local players say the market is just too small for many international publishers to justify maintaining a presence here. "Producing a magazine costs pretty much the same no matter where you are in the world," PacPubs general manager of publishing Angela Brooks says. "But to get the same returns in Australia as the UK, you have to sell three to four times as many copies."
Even though Vogue boasts healthy circulation and advertising revenue, Conde Nast never managed to get its Australian costs under control. By sharing overheads across IPMG's magazine division, Michael Hannan is adamant he'll make money publishing the Conde Nast titles.
"We don't have any illusions about holding titles for years that don't make any money." Read more